Pelvic Mesh Class Action
The Class Action proceedings arise from allegations which concern mesh devices made wholly or in part from Polypropylene in order to treat Pelvic Organ Prolapse (“POP”) and/or Stress Urinary Incontinence (“SUI”) (“Mesh Implant”), which Mesh Implant/(s) were/are designed, tested, manufactured, licensed, marketed, promoted, imported, distributed, supplied, sold and/or otherwise made available to consumers by the Respondents
Contact Us
15Apr
What women are claiming for in the J&J and Coloplast Class Action
02Apr
How Would Complications from A Pelvic Mesh Device Affect My Quality of Life?
18Jan
LONG TERM IMPLICATIONS AFTER REVISION SURGERY
30Nov
PELVIC MESH DEVICES: WHAT WENT WRONG
31Oct
RH Lawyers and RSI Institute Class Action against Johnson & Johnson and Coloplast
04Sep
PROFIT BEFORE PEOPLE: HOW MESH DEVICE MANUFACTURERS MISREPRESENTED THE SAFTEY OF PELVIC MESH DEVICES
04Aug
Why certain Pelvic Mesh devices are being re-called.
27Jun
Pelvic Mesh Devices: Frequently Asked Questions
12Jun
Is Pelvic Mesh the Safest Treatment Option for Stress Urinary Incontinence and Pelvic Organ Prolapse?
30May
PERSONAL ACCOUNT OF A SOUTH-AFRICAN WOMAN AFFECTED BY A PELVIC MESH DEVICE
13Oct
Why Polypropylene Mesh Devices Are Often Not Suitable to Be Implanted in the Pelvic Region
13Oct
Pelvic Mesh: The Obligations of Medical Device Manufacturers Under the CPA